Djibouti vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Djibouti
48.43
in 2019
Singapore
84.53
in 2019
Djibouti rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Djibouti
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 84.53 against 48.43 in Djibouti, a difference of 36.1.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.7 times Djibouti's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 1 regions.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Djibouti or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 84.53 against 48.43 in Djibouti as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Djibouti and Singapore?
- 36.1, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Singapore?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Djibouti and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Djibouti ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.