Djibouti vs South Korea: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Djibouti
48.43
in 2019
South Korea
84.15
in 2019
Djibouti rank
1st
South Korea rank
2nd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Djibouti
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 84.15 against 48.43 in Djibouti, a difference of 35.72.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.7 times Djibouti's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 2nd of 1 regions.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Djibouti or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 84.15 against 48.43 in Djibouti as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Djibouti and South Korea?
- 35.72, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and South Korea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Djibouti and South Korea rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Djibouti ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 2nd of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.