Djibouti vs Kazakhstan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Djibouti
48.43
in 2019
Kazakhstan
81.25
in 2019
Djibouti rank
1st
Kazakhstan rank
4th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Djibouti
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 81.25 against 48.43 in Djibouti, a difference of 32.82.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.7 times Djibouti's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 1st and Kazakhstan ranks 4th of 1 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Djibouti or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 81.25 against 48.43 in Djibouti as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Djibouti and Kazakhstan?
- 32.82, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Kazakhstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Djibouti and Kazakhstan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Djibouti ranks 1st and Kazakhstan ranks 4th of 1 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.