Denmark vs Germany: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Denmark
73.92
in 2019
Germany
74.1
in 2019
Denmark rank
15th
Germany rank
14th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Denmark
  • Germany
020406080201520172019

How they compare

Germany currently reports 74.1 against 73.92 in Denmark, a difference of 0.18.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Germany ahead.

Denmark ranks 15th and Germany ranks 14th of 188 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Denmark or Germany?
Germany, at 74.1 against 73.92 in Denmark as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Denmark and Germany?
0.18, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Germany?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Denmark and Germany rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Denmark ranks 15th and Germany ranks 14th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.