Czechia vs Marshall Islands: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Czechia
56.38
in 2019
Marshall Islands
55.93
in 2019
Czechia rank
102nd
Marshall Islands rank
105th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Czechia
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 56.38 against 55.93 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.45.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 102nd and Marshall Islands ranks 105th of 188 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Czechia or Marshall Islands?
- Czechia, at 56.38 against 55.93 in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Czechia and Marshall Islands?
- 0.45, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Marshall Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Marshall Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Czechia ranks 102nd and Marshall Islands ranks 105th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.