Czechia vs Equatorial Guinea: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Czechia
56.38
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
56.17
in 2019
Czechia rank
102nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
104th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Czechia
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 56.38 against 56.17 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.21.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 102nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th of 188 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Czechia or Equatorial Guinea?
- Czechia, at 56.38 against 56.17 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Czechia and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.21, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Equatorial Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Czechia ranks 102nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.