Cyprus vs Indonesia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Cyprus
48.59
in 2019
Indonesia
49.09
in 2019
Cyprus rank
141st
Indonesia rank
138th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Cyprus
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 49.09 against 48.59 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 141st and Indonesia ranks 138th of 188 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Cyprus or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 49.09 against 48.59 in Cyprus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Cyprus and Indonesia?
- 0.5, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Indonesia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Cyprus and Indonesia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Cyprus ranks 141st and Indonesia ranks 138th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.