Croatia vs Spain: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Croatia
70.6
in 2019
Spain
70.9
in 2019
Croatia rank
28th
Spain rank
27th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Croatia
  • Spain
020406080201520172019

How they compare

Spain currently reports 70.9 against 70.6 in Croatia, a difference of 0.3.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 28th and Spain ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Croatia or Spain?
Spain, at 70.9 against 70.6 in Croatia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Croatia and Spain?
0.3, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Spain?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Croatia and Spain rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Croatia ranks 28th and Spain ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.