Croatia vs Hungary: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Croatia
70.6
in 2019
Hungary
70.98
in 2019
Croatia rank
28th
Hungary rank
26th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Croatia
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 70.98 against 70.6 in Croatia, a difference of 0.38.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 28th and Hungary ranks 26th of 188 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Croatia or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 70.98 against 70.6 in Croatia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Croatia and Hungary?
- 0.38, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Hungary?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and Hungary rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Croatia ranks 28th and Hungary ranks 26th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.