Cote d'Ivoire vs Guyana: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Cote d'Ivoire
57.6
in 2019
Guyana
57.87
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
93rd
Guyana rank
91st

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Guyana
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 57.87 against 57.6 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.27.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 93rd and Guyana ranks 91st of 188 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Cote d'Ivoire or Guyana?
Guyana, at 57.87 against 57.6 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Cote d'Ivoire and Guyana?
0.27, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Guyana?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Guyana rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 93rd and Guyana ranks 91st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.