Cote d'Ivoire vs Ecuador: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Cote d'Ivoire
57.6
in 2019
Ecuador
57.53
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
93rd
Ecuador rank
95th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Ecuador
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 57.6 against 57.53 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.07.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Ecuador ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 93rd and Ecuador ranks 95th of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Cote d'Ivoire or Ecuador?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 57.6 against 57.53 in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Cote d'Ivoire and Ecuador?
0.07, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Ecuador?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Ecuador rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 93rd and Ecuador ranks 95th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.