Costa Rica vs Jordan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Costa Rica
55.19
in 2019
Jordan
55.56
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
110th
Jordan rank
109th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 55.56 against 55.19 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.37.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 110th and Jordan ranks 109th of 188 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Costa Rica or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 55.56 against 55.19 in Costa Rica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Costa Rica and Jordan?
- 0.37, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Jordan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Jordan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 110th and Jordan ranks 109th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.