Congo vs Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Congo
43.99
in 2019
Solomon Islands
43.49
in 2019
Congo rank
156th
Solomon Islands rank
158th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Congo
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Congo currently reports 43.99 against 43.49 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Congo ranks 156th and Solomon Islands ranks 158th of 191 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Congo or Solomon Islands?
- Congo, at 43.99 against 43.49 in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Congo and Solomon Islands?
- 0.5, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Solomon Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Solomon Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Congo ranks 156th and Solomon Islands ranks 158th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.