Comoros vs Guatemala: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Comoros
32.97
in 2019
Guatemala
34.55
in 2019
Comoros rank
177th
Guatemala rank
174th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Comoros
  • Guatemala
0102030201520172019

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 34.55 against 32.97 in Comoros, a difference of 1.58.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 177th and Guatemala ranks 174th of 188 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Comoros or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 34.55 against 32.97 in Comoros as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Comoros and Guatemala?
1.58, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Guatemala?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Comoros and Guatemala rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Comoros ranks 177th and Guatemala ranks 174th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.