China vs Lithuania: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
China
80.91
in 2019
Lithuania
78.8
in 2019
China rank
5th
Lithuania rank
7th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Lithuania
How they compare
China currently reports 80.91 against 78.8 in Lithuania, a difference of 2.11.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Lithuania ahead.
China ranks 5th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 188 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, China or Lithuania?
- China, at 80.91 against 78.8 in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between China and Lithuania?
- 2.11, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Lithuania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China and Lithuania rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 5th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.