China vs South Korea: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
China
80.91
in 2019
South Korea
84.15
in 2019
China rank
5th
South Korea rank
2nd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 84.15 against 80.91 in China, a difference of 3.24.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
China ranks 5th and South Korea ranks 2nd of 188 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, China or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 84.15 against 80.91 in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between China and South Korea?
- 3.24, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and South Korea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China and South Korea rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 5th and South Korea ranks 2nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.