China vs Estonia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
China
80.91
in 2019
Estonia
76.06
in 2019
China rank
5th
Estonia rank
8th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Estonia
How they compare
China currently reports 80.91 against 76.06 in Estonia, a difference of 4.85.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 5th and Estonia ranks 8th of 188 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, China or Estonia?
- China, at 80.91 against 76.06 in Estonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between China and Estonia?
- 4.85, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Estonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China and Estonia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 5th and Estonia ranks 8th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.