Chile vs Poland: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Chile
64.72
in 2019
Poland
64.36
in 2019
Chile rank
53rd
Poland rank
54th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Chile
  • Poland
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Chile currently reports 64.72 against 64.36 in Poland, a difference of 0.36.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Poland ahead.

Chile ranks 53rd and Poland ranks 54th of 188 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Chile or Poland?
Chile, at 64.72 against 64.36 in Poland as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Chile and Poland?
0.36, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Poland?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Chile and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Chile ranks 53rd and Poland ranks 54th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.