Chile vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Chile
64.72
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
64.73
in 2019
Chile rank
55th
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
53rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Chile
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 64.73 against 64.72 in Chile, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Chile ranks 55th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 53rd of 191 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Chile or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 64.73 against 64.72 in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Chile and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0.01, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Chile ranks 55th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 53rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.