Chile vs Japan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Chile
64.72
in 2019
Japan
65.26
in 2019
Chile rank
53rd
Japan rank
50th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Chile
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 65.26 against 64.72 in Chile, a difference of 0.54.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 53rd and Japan ranks 50th of 188 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Chile or Japan?
- Japan, at 65.26 against 64.72 in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Chile and Japan?
- 0.54, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Japan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Japan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Chile ranks 53rd and Japan ranks 50th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.