Cameroon vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Cameroon
39.91
in 2019
Sri Lanka
41.16
in 2019
Cameroon rank
165th
Sri Lanka rank
162nd

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cameroon
  • Sri Lanka
010203040201520172019

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 41.16 against 39.91 in Cameroon, a difference of 1.25.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 165th and Sri Lanka ranks 162nd of 188 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Cameroon or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 41.16 against 39.91 in Cameroon as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Cameroon and Sri Lanka?
1.25, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Sri Lanka?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Cameroon and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Cameroon ranks 165th and Sri Lanka ranks 162nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.