Burkina Faso vs Mozambique: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Burkina Faso
41.05
in 2019
Mozambique
39.78
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
163rd
Mozambique rank
166th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Mozambique
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 41.05 against 39.78 in Mozambique, a difference of 1.27.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 163rd and Mozambique ranks 166th of 188 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Burkina Faso or Mozambique?
- Burkina Faso, at 41.05 against 39.78 in Mozambique as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Burkina Faso and Mozambique?
- 1.27, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Mozambique?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Mozambique rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 163rd and Mozambique ranks 166th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.