Brunei vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Brunei
62.8
in 2019
Serbia
63.14
in 2019
Brunei rank
65th
Serbia rank
64th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Brunei
  • Serbia
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 63.14 against 62.8 in Brunei, a difference of 0.34.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Brunei ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 64th of 188 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Brunei or Serbia?
Serbia, at 63.14 against 62.8 in Brunei as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Brunei and Serbia?
0.34, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Serbia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Brunei and Serbia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Brunei ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 64th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.