Brunei vs Namibia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Brunei
62.8
in 2019
Namibia
63.44
in 2019
Brunei rank
65th
Namibia rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Brunei
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 63.44 against 62.8 in Brunei, a difference of 0.64.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Namibia ahead.
Brunei ranks 65th and Namibia ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Brunei or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 63.44 against 62.8 in Brunei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Brunei and Namibia?
- 0.64, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Brunei and Namibia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Brunei ranks 65th and Namibia ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.