Brunei vs Ethiopia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Brunei
62.8
in 2019
Ethiopia
62.77
in 2019
Brunei rank
67th
Ethiopia rank
68th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Brunei
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 62.8 against 62.77 in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Brunei ranks 67th and Ethiopia ranks 68th of 191 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Brunei or Ethiopia?
- Brunei, at 62.8 against 62.77 in Ethiopia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Brunei and Ethiopia?
- 0.03, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Ethiopia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Brunei and Ethiopia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Brunei ranks 67th and Ethiopia ranks 68th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.