Botswana vs Kyrgyzstan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Botswana
49.99
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
50.42
in 2019
Botswana rank
138th
Kyrgyzstan rank
135th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Botswana
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 50.42 against 49.99 in Botswana, a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 138th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Botswana or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 50.42 against 49.99 in Botswana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Botswana and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.43, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Botswana ranks 138th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 135th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.