Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guyana: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
57.82
in 2019
Guyana
57.87
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
93rd
Guyana rank
92nd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 57.87 against 57.82 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Guyana ranks 92nd of 190 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 57.87 against 57.82 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guyana?
- 0.05, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guyana?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guyana rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Guyana ranks 92nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.