Bolivia vs Marshall Islands: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Bolivia
55.57
in 2019
Marshall Islands
55.93
in 2019
Bolivia rank
108th
Marshall Islands rank
105th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Bolivia
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 55.93 against 55.57 in Bolivia, a difference of 0.36.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 108th and Marshall Islands ranks 105th of 188 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Bolivia or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 55.93 against 55.57 in Bolivia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Bolivia and Marshall Islands?
- 0.36, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Marshall Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Marshall Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Bolivia ranks 108th and Marshall Islands ranks 105th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.