Bolivia vs Jordan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Bolivia
55.57
in 2019
Jordan
55.56
in 2019
Bolivia rank
108th
Jordan rank
109th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bolivia
  • Jordan
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 55.57 against 55.56 in Jordan, a difference of 0.01.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Bolivia has been ahead every year.

Bolivia ranks 108th and Jordan ranks 109th of 188 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Bolivia or Jordan?
Bolivia, at 55.57 against 55.56 in Jordan as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Bolivia and Jordan?
0.01, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Jordan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Bolivia and Jordan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Bolivia ranks 108th and Jordan ranks 109th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.