Bhutan vs Croatia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Bhutan
69.99
in 2019
Croatia
70.6
in 2019
Bhutan rank
29th
Croatia rank
28th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bhutan
  • Croatia
020406080201520172019

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 70.6 against 69.99 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.61.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 29th and Croatia ranks 28th of 188 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Bhutan or Croatia?
Croatia, at 70.6 against 69.99 in Bhutan as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Bhutan and Croatia?
0.61, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Croatia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Bhutan and Croatia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Bhutan ranks 29th and Croatia ranks 28th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.