Belgium vs Chile: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Belgium
64.25
in 2019
Chile
64.72
in 2019
Belgium rank
55th
Chile rank
53rd

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Belgium
  • Chile
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Chile currently reports 64.72 against 64.25 in Belgium, a difference of 0.47.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 55th and Chile ranks 53rd of 188 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Belgium or Chile?
Chile, at 64.72 against 64.25 in Belgium as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Belgium and Chile?
0.47, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Chile?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Belgium and Chile rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Belgium ranks 55th and Chile ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.