Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Barbados
38.95
in 2019
Zimbabwe
39.66
in 2019
Barbados rank
168th
Zimbabwe rank
167th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Barbados
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 39.66 against 38.95 in Barbados, a difference of 0.71.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 168th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 188 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Barbados or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 39.66 against 38.95 in Barbados as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Barbados and Zimbabwe?
- 0.71, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Barbados ranks 168th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.