Barbados vs Guinea-Bissau: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Barbados
38.95
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau
38.61
in 2019
Barbados rank
168th
Guinea-Bissau rank
169th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Barbados
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 38.95 against 38.61 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.34.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 168th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 169th of 188 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Barbados or Guinea-Bissau?
- Barbados, at 38.95 against 38.61 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Barbados and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.34, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Guinea-Bissau?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Barbados ranks 168th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 169th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.