Barbados vs Eswatini: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Barbados
38.95
in 2019
Eswatini
36.72
in 2019
Barbados rank
171st
Eswatini rank
173rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Barbados
- Eswatini
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 38.95 against 36.72 in Eswatini, a difference of 2.23.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 171st and Eswatini ranks 173rd of 191 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Barbados or Eswatini?
- Barbados, at 38.95 against 36.72 in Eswatini as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Barbados and Eswatini?
- 2.23, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Eswatini?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Eswatini rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Barbados ranks 171st and Eswatini ranks 173rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.