Bangladesh vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Bangladesh
22.21
in 2019
East Timor
6.13
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
187th
East Timor rank
188th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Bangladesh
- East Timor
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 22.21 against 6.13 in East Timor, a difference of 16.08.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 3.6 times East Timor's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 187th and East Timor ranks 188th of 188 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Bangladesh or East Timor?
- Bangladesh, at 22.21 against 6.13 in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Bangladesh and East Timor?
- 16.08, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and East Timor?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Bangladesh ranks 187th and East Timor ranks 188th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.