Bangladesh vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Bangladesh
22.21
in 2019
Suriname
25.94
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
190th
Suriname rank
189th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 25.94 against 22.21 in Bangladesh, a difference of 3.73.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 190th and Suriname ranks 189th of 191 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Bangladesh or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 25.94 against 22.21 in Bangladesh as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Bangladesh and Suriname?
- 3.73, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Bangladesh ranks 190th and Suriname ranks 189th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.