Bahrain vs Moldova: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Bahrain
63.79
in 2019
Moldova
63.65
in 2019
Bahrain rank
58th
Moldova rank
61st

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bahrain
  • Moldova
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 63.79 against 63.65 in Moldova, a difference of 0.14.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Moldova ahead.

Bahrain ranks 58th and Moldova ranks 61st of 188 countries.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Bahrain or Moldova?
Bahrain, at 63.79 against 63.65 in Moldova as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Bahrain and Moldova?
0.14, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Moldova?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Bahrain and Moldova rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Bahrain ranks 58th and Moldova ranks 61st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.