Bahamas vs Peru: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Bahamas
59.07
in 2019
Peru
59.07
in 2019
Bahamas rank
81st
Peru rank
82nd

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bahamas
  • Peru
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 59.07 against 59.07 in Peru, a difference of 0.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 81st and Peru ranks 82nd of 188 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Bahamas or Peru?
Bahamas, at 59.07 against 59.07 in Peru as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Bahamas and Peru?
0, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Peru?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Bahamas and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Bahamas ranks 81st and Peru ranks 82nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.