Azerbaijan vs Denmark: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Azerbaijan
74.92
in 2019
Denmark
73.92
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
13th
Denmark rank
15th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Denmark
020406080201520172019

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 74.92 against 73.92 in Denmark, a difference of 1.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Denmark ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 13th and Denmark ranks 15th of 188 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Azerbaijan or Denmark?
Azerbaijan, at 74.92 against 73.92 in Denmark as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Azerbaijan and Denmark?
1, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Denmark?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Azerbaijan and Denmark rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Azerbaijan ranks 13th and Denmark ranks 15th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.