Austria vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Austria
75.49
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
75.88
in 2019
Austria rank
10th
United Arab Emirates rank
9th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Austria
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 75.88 against 75.49 in Austria, a difference of 0.39.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 10th and United Arab Emirates ranks 9th of 188 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Austria or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 75.88 against 75.49 in Austria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Austria and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.39, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and United Arab Emirates?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Austria and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Austria ranks 10th and United Arab Emirates ranks 9th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.