Armenia vs Iceland: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Armenia
69.71
in 2019
Iceland
69.1
in 2019
Armenia rank
30th
Iceland rank
33rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Armenia
- Iceland
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 69.71 against 69.1 in Iceland, a difference of 0.61.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Iceland ahead.
Armenia ranks 30th and Iceland ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Armenia or Iceland?
- Armenia, at 69.71 against 69.1 in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Armenia and Iceland?
- 0.61, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Iceland rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Armenia ranks 30th and Iceland ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.