Armenia vs Bhutan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Armenia
69.71
in 2019
Bhutan
69.99
in 2019
Armenia rank
30th
Bhutan rank
29th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Armenia
  • Bhutan
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 69.99 against 69.71 in Armenia, a difference of 0.28.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 30th and Bhutan ranks 29th of 188 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Armenia or Bhutan?
Bhutan, at 69.99 against 69.71 in Armenia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Armenia and Bhutan?
0.28, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Bhutan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Armenia and Bhutan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Armenia ranks 30th and Bhutan ranks 29th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.