Argentina vs Lesotho: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Argentina
57.51
in 2019
Lesotho
57.18
in 2019
Argentina rank
98th
Lesotho rank
100th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Argentina
- Lesotho
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 57.51 against 57.18 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.33.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Lesotho ahead.
Argentina ranks 98th and Lesotho ranks 100th of 191 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Argentina or Lesotho?
- Argentina, at 57.51 against 57.18 in Lesotho as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Argentina and Lesotho?
- 0.33, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Lesotho?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Lesotho rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Argentina ranks 98th and Lesotho ranks 100th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.