Argentina vs Canada: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Argentina
57.51
in 2019
Canada
57.13
in 2019
Argentina rank
96th
Canada rank
99th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Argentina
  • Canada
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 57.51 against 57.13 in Canada, a difference of 0.38.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 96th and Canada ranks 99th of 188 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Argentina or Canada?
Argentina, at 57.51 against 57.13 in Canada as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Argentina and Canada?
0.38, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Canada?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Argentina and Canada rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Argentina ranks 96th and Canada ranks 99th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.