Antigua and Barbuda vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Antigua and Barbuda
68.11
in 2019
United Kingdom
68.69
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
36th
United Kingdom rank
34th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • United Kingdom
0204060201520172019

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 68.69 against 68.11 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.58.

Across all 5 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 36th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 188 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 68.69 against 68.11 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and United Kingdom?
0.58, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and United Kingdom?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 36th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.