Antigua and Barbuda vs Iceland: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
68.11
in 2019
Iceland
69.1
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
36th
Iceland rank
33rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 69.1 against 68.11 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.99.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 36th and Iceland ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 69.1 against 68.11 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Iceland?
- 0.99, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Iceland rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 36th and Iceland ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.