Angola vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Angola
28.11
in 2019
Suriname
25.94
in 2019
Angola rank
184th
Suriname rank
186th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Angola
- Suriname
How they compare
Angola currently reports 28.11 against 25.94 in Suriname, a difference of 2.17.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 184th and Suriname ranks 186th of 188 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Angola or Suriname?
- Angola, at 28.11 against 25.94 in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Angola and Suriname?
- 2.17, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Angola ranks 184th and Suriname ranks 186th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.