Algeria vs Jordan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Algeria
54.78
in 2019
Jordan
55.56
in 2019
Algeria rank
112th
Jordan rank
109th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Algeria
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 55.56 against 54.78 in Algeria, a difference of 0.78.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 112th and Jordan ranks 109th of 188 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Algeria or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 55.56 against 54.78 in Algeria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Algeria and Jordan?
- 0.78, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Jordan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Algeria and Jordan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Algeria ranks 112th and Jordan ranks 109th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.