Turkey vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Turkey
67.13
in 2014
United Kingdom
67.41
in 2014
Turkey rank
35th
United Kingdom rank
34th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Turkey
  • United Kingdom
020406080200320082014

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 67.41 against 67.13 in Turkey, a difference of 0.28.

Across all 12 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Turkey ranks 35th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 181 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkey United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 64.44 67.25 2.8 United Kingdom
2010s 65.85 67.82 1.98 United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Turkey or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 67.41 against 67.13 in Turkey as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Turkey and United Kingdom?
0.28, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkey and United Kingdom?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Turkey and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Turkey ranks 35th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.