Tajikistan vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Tajikistan
67.42
in 2014
United Kingdom
67.41
in 2014
Tajikistan rank
33rd
United Kingdom rank
34th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Tajikistan
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 67.42 against 67.41 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 33rd and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.42 | 66.4 | 1.03 | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 67.42 | 67.82 | 0.3998 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Tajikistan or United Kingdom?
- Tajikistan, at 67.42 against 67.41 in United Kingdom as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Tajikistan and United Kingdom?
- 0.01, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and United Kingdom?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Tajikistan and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Tajikistan ranks 33rd and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.